Tuesday 15 December 2015

Primary Research- Interview- Carl Horne






After reading Carl Horne's book in the summer about slow movement I decided that I would write my last chapter on slow movement and more specifically slow technology, how people should slow down and live the good life rather than the fast life. 


I sent an email to Carl asking him a few questions. 



I decided to give him a call and ask him a few questions over the phone. 

Here are his responses:


What I found interesting about your book is the first chapter where you talk about the one-minute bedtime story with your son, having an actual publication in your hands and taking time out of your day, rather than being on media devices.

What is your opinion on slow technology? What does slow technology mean to you?
Do you think that technology and publication clash or complement each other?


My view is that in a way its hard to know exactly where we are going with publication, we are in the middle of a time of immense up evil and its not quite clear how it is going to shape out. What is clear is that the old model (print publication) isn’t as sustainable anymore, especially when you think of things such as newspapers they just can’t make money because they’ve lost all that advertising revenue also peoples habits have changed. I see that in my own life, I’m a journalist and I love newspaper and I have always brought them all my life, but I don’t buy newspapers anymore I read news online, I have the app for the guardian, the BBC is my homepage on my laptop, so those are my two main sources. I read other publications online that I would have never been able to get anyway such as the New York Times. I’m not against people reading things online, I just think that what we will probably end up with and certainly what we should aspire to is to have a mixed eco system, where some publication is delivered through a screen and ones that are most appropriate to that will find themselves coming through pixels.


Do you think digital and print can complement each other?

Yeah, I can see that in my own life, I spend a lot of time reading news. I read the right gratification quarterly, I write for and I read Kinfolk which is a beautiful magazine, I enjoy that offline cagoule experience, a different type of reading, one that is richer less distracted and more layered than we will ever get online because online Is too jumpy, too nervy, so many hyperlinks pulling us off in different directions. The drive with online publishing is that someone its not enough to give people text, you’ve got to give them video, audio. I don’t ever read a screen for pleasure, I reading it because it’s the simplest, easiest delivery mechanism. When I’m reading for pleasure, when I read a book especially and I’ve got to read a lot of books for researching, I will never read online, I will always buy the hard copy because its just a different experience reading, the sensual pleasure of the book the feeling and weight of the book and pages and that’s got a nostalgic tactile appeal to it, a different type of reading goes on. There is research showing how people interact differently with information, getting more of an experience with it when there is something tactile going on. Taking notes on a laptop, it turns out that people don’t register the information, they don’t absorb it as well as they would when writing with a pen and paper. Its that thought process. Typing is too quick, its too seamless. I think the same thing happens with reading, people read more superficially online, and you see that as well in the way that people write, there tends to be a blogging style of writing. I think we are going to end up with a range basically two types of delivery, essentially you will have screen based publications which will have a different kind of approach, it will be very useful and valuable, and then you will have he offline printed paper. There will be more and more magazine going for real quality, with really good paper, turning that delivery mechanism of the magazine or the paper or the book into something that is beautiful it self as a physical artefact, seeing more and more beautiful high end publications and books, publishing novels with letter press all that kind of stuff, I think it’s a response to the need and the deserve to have that other form of reading.

With children growing up with all this technology do you think they are going to get sucked into the screen and miss out on real life?

There is a danger, I’ve spoke to parents that work at google, Microsoft and Apple what are they doing with their own kids they are not giving them iPads and iPhones they are giving them books they are sending them outside to play as there are plenty of screens in the classroom. Children need to have books as they are tactile they are physical, there’s a whole layer of working. The screen is not a learning curve, its just one thing that is flat, there’s no layers to it. We learn physically, we learn by moving and touching especially children. There’s something so precious and universal about printed books and in fact.
The printed word is powerful. People are looking for something that is real and unique to them.

What do you think that makes people realise that they are spending too much time on technology?

I think there is a few things, one is eventually they start to realise that a lot of other things have got dropped, so if you are spending seven/eight hours online all the other stuff that you used to do before you went online, like seeing people face to face, cooking etc they would just stop happening. So at some point you realise you’ve lost all the things you used to do, then if you so the arithmetic you realise its gone into Facebook and Twitter. It’s a common thing now people just waking up one day and thinking ‘this is insane’ they lose control of the technology and become a slave to it. It’s just nice to switch off. Many people now are doing digital detoxes and restricting the amount of time they spend online. It comes down to the feeling of dissatisfaction and the promise of technology. I do think that technology is great we just have to use it wisely. If we don’t use it wisely we become addicted to it and it almost becomes like eating too much fast food

Do you think technology is making people lazy?

Lazy, yes I think it has, I think it is definitely making people socially lazy, because real relationships take time and they can be uncomfortable and there’s silences and you don’t know what to say, where as It is so so easy and frictionless online, and I think it is a cop out often to be doing all of your relationships online, because there is more heavy lifting face to face, a more complex rich experience. Online is one channel of interaction, one layer of interaction and it’s easy, its an illusion its not a real connection. It makes us physically lazy and can make us lazy even intellectually, we are moving to a culture that is very much about a superficial understanding of the world, we know a lot of little things that maybe we don’t make the deeper bigger effort to connect the dots of understanding. We know all the headlines we know the tweets, but if we actually dug deep into that story and got to grips with it I think often it’s the illusion that’s formed, its just information, information is not the same thing as understanding, understanding takes effort and time and when you get lazy you stop the understanding and just go for the information.



I gained some interesting responses from Carl and I will be using his opinions and knowledge within my dissertation. 

No comments:

Post a Comment